CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

科学研究

Abstract

Recommended Article

Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of DAPT disruption due to non-compliance vs. bleeding after PCI: insights from the PARIS Registry Shock Team Approach in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Proof of Concept SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019 Novel functions of macrophages in the heart: insights into electrical conduction, stress, and diastolic dysfunction Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation Application of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Suspected Myocardial Infarction Randomized Comparison Between Radial and Femoral Large-Bore Access for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus

Expert Opinion

JOURNAL:ACC Article Link

What is the Importance of LDL-C Control in Diabetes Patients Post-Revascularization?

ACC News Story Keywords: diabetes; coronary revascularization; LDL-Cholesterol

Pre-reading

In patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes, lower LDL-C at 1 year following coronary revascularization may be associated with improved long-term MACCE (major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events), according to a study published Nov. 2 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.


Michael E. Farkouh, MD, FACC, et al., conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of three revascularization clinical trials (BARI 2D, COURAGE and FREEDOM) of 4,050 patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Patients were categorized according to the levels of LDL-C at 1 year following randomization, and were followed for a median of 3.9 years.

Results showed that patients whose LDL-C at 1 year remained ≥100 mg/dl experienced higher 4-year cumulative risk of the primary endpoint of MACCE, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke.


In addition, the researchers found that patients with PCI experienced a reduction in MACCE only if 1-year LDL-C was less than 70 mg/dl, vs. optimal medical therapy alone, whereas CABG was associated with improved outcomes. Further, in patients with 1-year LDL-C ≥70 mg/dl, patients undergoing CABG had "significantly lower" MACCE rates vs. PCI.


The researchers explain that their results "are in accordance with" the 2018 American Heart Association/ACC Guidelines on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. "According to these guidelines, our analysis comprises a combination of high-risk and very-high-risk patients who should be prescribed high-intensity statin and other LDL-C-lowering therapies with a target LDL-C of at least 70 mg/dl. This is particularly important in patients who underwent revascularization with PCI, because no MACCE benefit was observed in these patients with 1-year LDL-C levels >70 mg/dl," they add.


In a related editorial comment, Eliano P. Navarese, MD, PhD, FACC, et al., note that the study's findings "are relevant for clinical practice and may pave the way toward the generation of novel personalized medicine models that can optimize care of patients with type 2 diabetes."