CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

科学研究

Abstract

Recommended Article

Percutaneous Support Devices for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Microthrombi As A Major Cause of Cardiac Injury in COVID-19: A Pathologic Study Considerations for Single-Measurement Risk-Stratification Strategies for Myocardial Infarction Using Cardiac Troponin Assays Burden of 30-Day Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 833,344 Patients in the United States: Predictors, Causes, and Cost Society of cardiac angiography and interventions: suggested management of the no-reflow phenomenon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory Frequency, Regional Variation, and Predictors of Undetermined Cause of Death in Cardiometabolic Clinical Trials: A Pooled Analysis of 9259 Deaths in 9 Trials Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (the CRISP CT study): a post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data Impact of lesion complexity on peri-procedural adverse events and the benefit of potent intravenous platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibition after percutaneous coronary intervention: core laboratory analysis from 10 854 patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial

Expert Opinion

JOURNAL:ACC Article Link

What is the Importance of LDL-C Control in Diabetes Patients Post-Revascularization?

ACC News Story Keywords: diabetes; coronary revascularization; LDL-Cholesterol

Pre-reading

In patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes, lower LDL-C at 1 year following coronary revascularization may be associated with improved long-term MACCE (major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events), according to a study published Nov. 2 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.


Michael E. Farkouh, MD, FACC, et al., conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of three revascularization clinical trials (BARI 2D, COURAGE and FREEDOM) of 4,050 patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Patients were categorized according to the levels of LDL-C at 1 year following randomization, and were followed for a median of 3.9 years.

Results showed that patients whose LDL-C at 1 year remained ≥100 mg/dl experienced higher 4-year cumulative risk of the primary endpoint of MACCE, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke.


In addition, the researchers found that patients with PCI experienced a reduction in MACCE only if 1-year LDL-C was less than 70 mg/dl, vs. optimal medical therapy alone, whereas CABG was associated with improved outcomes. Further, in patients with 1-year LDL-C ≥70 mg/dl, patients undergoing CABG had "significantly lower" MACCE rates vs. PCI.


The researchers explain that their results "are in accordance with" the 2018 American Heart Association/ACC Guidelines on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. "According to these guidelines, our analysis comprises a combination of high-risk and very-high-risk patients who should be prescribed high-intensity statin and other LDL-C-lowering therapies with a target LDL-C of at least 70 mg/dl. This is particularly important in patients who underwent revascularization with PCI, because no MACCE benefit was observed in these patients with 1-year LDL-C levels >70 mg/dl," they add.


In a related editorial comment, Eliano P. Navarese, MD, PhD, FACC, et al., note that the study's findings "are relevant for clinical practice and may pave the way toward the generation of novel personalized medicine models that can optimize care of patients with type 2 diabetes."