CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Stenting Left Main

Abstract

Recommended Article

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Do We Have the Evidence? Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Native Coronary Arteries Versus on Saphenous Venous Aorta Coronary Conduits in Patients With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Impella Device Implantation Achieved or Attempted (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial and the cVAD Registry) Incidence and Management of Restenosis After Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Disease With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents (from Failure in Left Main Study With 2nd Generation Stents-Cardiogroup III Study) Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Two-year outcomes following unprotected left main stenting with first vs new-generation drug-eluting stents: the FINE registry. EuroIntervention. Management of left main disease: an update Complex PCI procedures: challenges for the interventional cardiologist Everolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. The PRECOMBAT-2 (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) study

Original Research

JOURNAL:CBSMD Article Link

PCI术后计划外再入院原因及应对策略

CBSMD

2018年4月 “Burden of 30-Day Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 833,344 Patients in the United States: Predictors, Causes, and Cost: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database”对美国本土再入院数据库进行研究后发现,术后30天计划外再入院比例为9.3%,与计划外30天再入院直接相关的因素包括术后非医嘱类出院 OR=1.19,转院至短期保健医院OR=1.62, 回家疗养OR=1.57, 慢性肾病OR=1.50,查尔森合并症指数OR=1.28, 并发症的数量OR=1.18。一半以上的计划外再入院与不良心脏事件无关。下图呈现了有无再入院的整体卫生经济费用对比。




2018年7月“Discharge Against Medical Advice After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States”也使用大数据对因非医嘱出院造成的PCI术后30天再入院的情况(discharge against medical advice,DAMA)展开评估, 从2,021,104名患者中找出0.5%的出院符合此类情况,DAMA患者群30天再入院机率是非DAMA患者群的近2倍(16.8% vs. 8.5%, p <.001),且可作为再入院强预测因子。DAMA人群或因AMI、吸烟、酗酒、药物滥用等原因要求自行出院。DAMA患者群应倾向因神经精神系统相关非心源性事件和急性心肌梗死相关心源性事件再入院。





2019年4月“Timing and Causes of Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database”对2,412,000例中PCI术后60天计划外再入院患者的主诉进行探究后发现,约有25%的PCI患者术后遭遇计划外再入院事件,其中的主因确为非心源性事件,而非典型性胸痛是最频发主诉。 心源性事件有包含心绞痛的CAD,术后0-7天的急性心肌梗死和不同时间段发生的心力衰竭。




Kalra等Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmissions: Where Are the Solutions?”曾于2018年撰写评论文章指出,在计划外再入院中,应区别对待恰当的计划外再入院和不恰当再入院。恰当的计划外再入院,即可显著影响患者预后,影响死亡率的再入院;可采用"Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict 30-day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients"通过PCI前评估30天再入院识别高危人群。不恰当再入院,指即使改善医疗水平也无法改善患者死亡率的再入院,而此类计划外再入院应得到合理控制,已进一步控制不合理卫生支出。