CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Stenting Left Main

Abstract

Recommended Article

Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Left main coronary artery disease: importance, diagnosis, assessment, and management Comparative effectiveness analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease and unprotected left main coronary artery disease Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry Revascularization in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Original Research2019 Mar 12. pii: S0735-1097(19)33879-3.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with STEMI Treated with Fibrinolytic Therapy: TREAT Trial

Berwanger O, Lopes RD, Moia DDF et al. Keywords: ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy vs clopidogrel; efficacy; STEMI

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - The efficacy of ticagrelor in the long-term post ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy remains uncertain.


OBJECTIVES - To evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy.


METHODS - We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label with blinded endpoint adjudication trial that enrolled 3,799 patients (age < 75 years) with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy. Patients were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-to-600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter The key outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the same composite outcome with the addition of severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events at 12 months.


RESULTS - The combined outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke occurred in 129 of 1,913 patients (6.7%) receiving ticagrelor and in 137 of 1,886 patients (7.3%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio of 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.18; P=0.53). The composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events occurred in 153 of 1,913 patients (8.0%) treated with ticagrelor and in 171 of 1,886 patients (9.1%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio of 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.09; P=0.25). The rates of major, fatal, and intracranial bleeding were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups.


CONCLUSIONS - Among patients aged under 75 years with STEMI, administration of ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy did not significantly reduce the frequency of cardiovascular events when compared with clopidogrel.

 

Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.