CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Stenting Left Main

Abstract

Recommended Article

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial Intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Club Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club Bypass Surgery or Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes Differences between the left main and other bifurcations Left Main Revascularization in 2017 Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: the 13th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club

Original Research2019 Mar 12. pii: S0735-1097(19)33879-3.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with STEMI Treated with Fibrinolytic Therapy: TREAT Trial

Berwanger O, Lopes RD, Moia DDF et al. Keywords: ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy vs clopidogrel; efficacy; STEMI

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - The efficacy of ticagrelor in the long-term post ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy remains uncertain.


OBJECTIVES - To evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy.


METHODS - We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label with blinded endpoint adjudication trial that enrolled 3,799 patients (age < 75 years) with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy. Patients were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-to-600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter The key outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the same composite outcome with the addition of severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events at 12 months.


RESULTS - The combined outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke occurred in 129 of 1,913 patients (6.7%) receiving ticagrelor and in 137 of 1,886 patients (7.3%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio of 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.18; P=0.53). The composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events occurred in 153 of 1,913 patients (8.0%) treated with ticagrelor and in 171 of 1,886 patients (9.1%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio of 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.09; P=0.25). The rates of major, fatal, and intracranial bleeding were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups.


CONCLUSIONS - Among patients aged under 75 years with STEMI, administration of ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy did not significantly reduce the frequency of cardiovascular events when compared with clopidogrel.

 

Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.