CBS - The 17th Left Main & Coronary Bifurcation Summit, CBS2025

HOME | SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY | Stenting Left Main

Stenting Left Main

Comparative effectiveness analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease and unprotected left main coronary artery disease Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Left Main Disease: Pre- and Post-EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) and NOBLE (Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study) Era Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry Revascularization in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Sort by hits |<<... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >>|

Original Research2018 Dec 15;273:69-73.

JOURNAL：Int J Cardiol. Article Link

Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media

Azzalini L, Vilca LM, Lombardo F et al. Keywords: contrast media; contrast-induced acute kidney injury; contrast-induced nephropathy; percutaneous coronary intervention

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - There is controversy as to whether iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) are associated with lower risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), compared with low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). We aimed to evaluate if a differential risk of CI-AKI exists after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to different contrast media (CM) types.

METHODS - We performed a single-center retrospective study in a cohort of all-comers undergoing PCI between January 2012 and December 2016. CI-AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dl or ≥50% within 72 h from PCI. IOCM were represented by iodixanol, whereas four different LOCM were utilized (ioversol, iopromide, iomeprol, iobitridol). Multiple-treatment inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to identify whether CM type was an independent predictor of CI-AKI.

RESULTS - We included 2648 subjects (ioversol, n = 272; iopromide, n = 818; iomeprol, n = 611; iobitridol, n = 460; iodixanol, n = 487). CI-AKI occurred in 300 patients (11.7%) overall, with no differences across CM groups (ioversol 13.0%, iopromide 11.5%, iomeprol 10.2%, iobitridol 13.9%, iodixanol 11.3%; p = 0.42). CI-AKI requiring dialysis was observed in 8 patients (0.3%) overall (p = 0.50). On IPTW-adjusted analysis, none of the LOCM was associated with a significantly different risk of CI-AKI compared with iodixanol: ioversol OR 0.986 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.611-1.591), iopromide OR 0.870 (95% CI 0.606-1.250), iomeprol OR 0.904 (95% CI 0.619-1.319), iobitridol OR 1.258 (95% CI 0.850-1.861).

CONCLUSIONS - In a large cohort of all-comers undergoing PCI, there were no differences in the adjusted risk of CI-AKI across 4 LOCM, compared with iodixanol.

Abstract

Recommended Article

Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media

ABSTRACT