CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Stenting Left Main

Abstract

Recommended Article

Design and rationale for a randomised comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients with left main coronary artery disease: the EXCEL trial Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease Successful bailout stenting strategy against lethal coronary dissection involving left main bifurcation Radial versus femoral artery access in patients undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease: analysis from the EXCEL trial Intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Club Predictors of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trial Contemporary Approach to Coronary Bifurcation Lesion Treatment Bypass Surgery or Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes

Clinical TrialVolume 75, Issue 6, February 2020

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin After PCI: The TWILIGHT Platelet Substudy

U Baber, MU Zafar, R Mehran et al. Keywords: blood thrombogenicity; platelet aggregation; ticagrelor plus aspirin vs ticagrelor monotherapy

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - An evolving strategy in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involves withdrawal of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), or aspirin, while maintaining P2Y12 inhibition. However, the pharmacodynamic effects of this approach on blood thrombogenicity and platelet reactivity remain unknown.

 

OBJECTIVES - This study sought to compare the antithrombotic potency of ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus ASA among high-risk patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents.

 

METHODS - This was a mechanistic substudy within the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention) trial, which randomized patients undergoing PCI to ticagrelor plus placebo versus ticagrelor plus ASA following 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy. Substudy participants were enrolled after randomization, at which time ex vivo assays to quantify thrombus size under dynamic flow conditions and platelet reactivity were performed. Pharmacodynamic assessments were repeated 1 to 6 months thereafter. The primary endpoint was thrombus size at the post-randomization visit with platelet reactivity following stimuli to arachidonic acid, collagen, adenosine diphosphate, and thrombin as secondary endpoints. Results were analyzed using analysis of covariance.

 

RESULTS - A total of 51 patients were enrolled, among whom 42 underwent perfusion assays at baseline and follow-up with a median time between studies of 1.5 months. The adjusted mean difference in post-randomization thrombus area was similar between groups: 218.2 μm2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 575.9 to 139.9 μm2; p = 0.22). Markers sensitive to cyclo-oxygenase-1 blockade, including platelet reactivity in response to arachidonic acid (mean difference: 10.9 U; 95% CI: 1.9 to 19.9 U) and collagen (mean difference: 9.8 U; 95% CI: 0.8 to 18.8 U) stimuli were higher among patients receiving placebo, whereas levels of platelet reactivity were similar with adenosine diphosphate and thrombin.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Among high-risk patients receiving drug-eluting stents, the antithrombotic potency of ticagrelor monotherapy is similar to that of ticagrelor plus ASA with respect to ex vivo blood thrombogenicity, whereas markers sensitive to cyclo-oxygenase-1 blockade are increased in the absence of ASA. (Platelet Substudy of the TWILIGHT Trial; NCT04001374).