CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

左主干支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

10-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Bayesian Interpretation of the EXCEL Trial and Other Randomized Clinical Trials of Left Main Coronary Artery Revascularization Left Main Revascularization in 2017: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: the 13th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club Revascularization of left main coronary artery Safety of intermediate left main stenosis revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-regression including 908 deferred left main stenosis from 12 studies
|<<... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...>>|

Clinical Trial2020 May 14. [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL：Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Safety and efficacy of the bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in high-risk patients undergoing PCI: TWILIGHT-SYNERGY

U Baber, R Chandiramani, R Mehran et al. Keywords: stent comparation; DES; bioabsorbable; durable polymer; high-risk patients

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Data examining the safety and efficacy of the bioabsorbable polymer (BP) drug‐eluting stent (DES) as compared with durable polymer (DP) DES in high‐risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain limited.

 

METHODS - We conducted a pre‐specified analysis among patients enrolled in the TWILIGHT trial treated with the SYNERGY BP‐DES or a DP‐DES. Following successful PCI and 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were randomized to aspirin or placebo for 1 year; DES choice was at physician discretion. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) [composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST)].

 

RESULTS - Among enrolled participants (N = 9006), 653 were treated exclusively with the SYNERGY BP‐DES and 6404 with a comparator DP‐DES. Over 15 months, TLF rates were 6.4% and 6.1% among those receiving a SYNERGY BP‐DES and a DP‐DES, respectively (adjusted HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.64 – 1.35; p = 0.72). The effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and the composite of all‐cause death, MI or stroke was uniform across DES groups (both pint >0.10).

 

CONCLUSIONS - The safety and efficacy profile of the SYNERGY BP‐DES is comparable to that of contemporary DP‐DES in high‐risk patients undergoing PCI. Compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin, the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy is consistent among patients receiving SYNERGY BP‐DES or DP‐DES.

 

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top