CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血管内超声指导

Abstract

Recommended Article

Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters Associated With Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Deployment Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease The impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance during drug eluting stent implantation on angiographic outcomes Histopathologic validation of the intravascular ultrasound diagnosis of calcified coronary artery nodules Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis 3-Year Outcomes of the ULTIMATE Trial Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Comparison of inhospital mortality, length of hospitalization, costs, and vascular complications of percutaneous coronary interventions guided by ultrasound versus angiography

Editorial2019;321(24):2409-2411.

JOURNAL:JAMA. Article Link

Dual Antiplatelet TherapyIs It Time to Cut the Cord With Aspirin?

KM Ziada; DJ Moliterno et al. Keywords: DAPT; 1-month clopidogrel vs. 12 month aspirin and clopidogrel; clinical outcomes; 3 years

ABSTRACT


Since evidence of increased risk of stent thrombosis with first-generation drug-eluting stents surfaced in 20051,2 and the US Food and Drug Administration advised interventional cardiologists to use dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following implantation of drug-eluting stents, the appropriate duration of DAPT has been widely studied and hotly debated. Dual antiplatelet therapy consists of concurrent administration of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. Determining the duration of DAPT requires a balance between 2 objectives: lowering the risk of ischemic events with more intense and longer antiplatelet therapy vs lowering the risk of bleeding events with less intense and shorter antiplatelet therapy. Because second-generation drug-eluting stents are associated with lower rates of stent thrombosis,3 the argument against longer DAPT was revisited. The updated guidelines incorporated such considerations by recommending a shorter duration of DAPT for selected patients, namely those with stable clinical status in whom risk of ischemic events is low.4,5