CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血管内超声指导

Abstract

Recommended Article

Intravascular ultrasound predictors for edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study IVUS Guidance for Coronary Revascularization: When to Start, When to Stop? A Randomized Study of Distal Filter Protection Versus Conventional Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque Identified by Intravascular Ultrasound Temporal Trends in Inpatient Use of Intravascular Imaging Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents Role of Proximal Optimization Technique Guided by Intravascular Ultrasound on Stent Expansion, Stent Symmetry Index, and Side-Branch Hemodynamics in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions First-in-man evaluation of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) of Terumo: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography

Original ResearchVolume 13, Issue 6, March 2020

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Coronary Access After TAVR

T Ochiai, T Chakravarty, SH Yoon et al. Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; coronary angiography; CAD; PCI; TAVR

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of unfavorable coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using post-implantation computed tomography (CT).

 

BACKGROUND - Real-world data regarding coronary access after TAVR assessed using post-implantation CT are scarce.

 

METHODS - Post-TAVR CT of 66 patients treated with Evolut R or Evolut PRO valves and 345 patients treated with SAPIEN 3 valves were analyzed. The distance from inflow of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) to the coronary ostia and the overlap between THV commissures and the coronary ostia were assessed. Coronary access was defined as unfavorable if the coronary ostium was below the skirt or in front of the THV commissural posts above the skirt in each coronary artery.

 

RESULTS - CT-identified features of unfavorable coronary access were observed in 34.8% (n = 23) for the left coronary artery and 25.8% (n = 17) for the right coronary artery in the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group, while those percentages were 15.7% (n = 54) for the left coronary artery and 8.1% (n = 28) for the right coronary artery in the SAPIEN 3 group. In the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group, 16 coronary engagements were performed after TAVR, while 64 coronary engagements were performed in the SAPIEN 3 group after TAVR. In an engagement-level analysis, the success rates of selective coronary engagement were significantly lower in patients with CT-identified features of unfavorable coronary access compared with those with favorable coronary access in both the Evolut R/Evolut PRO (0.0% vs. 77.8%; p = 0.003) and SAPIEN 3 (33.3% vs. 91.4%; p = 0.003) groups.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Coronary access may be challenging in a significant proportion of patients after TAVR. THVs with low skirt or commissure height and large open cells that are designed to achieve commissure-to-commissure alignment with the native aortic valve may facilitate future coronary access. (Assessment of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis and Its Treatment With Anticoagulation [RESOLVE]; NCT02318342)