CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Acute Coronary Syndrom

Abstract

Recommended Article

Treating Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Why, How, and When? Another Nail in the Coffin for Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsion in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes in Patients Treated With Thin-Strut, Very Thin-Strut, or Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Small Coronary Vessels: A Prespecified Analysis of the Randomized BIO-RESORT Trial Elective Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Incidence, Determinants, and Outcome (From the CORONOR Study) Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group Precisely Tuned Inhibition of HIF Prolyl Hydroxylases Is Key for Cardioprotection After Ischemia Effect of Plaque Burden and Morphology on Myocardial Blood Flow and Fractional Flow Reserve

Clinical TrialVolume 11, Issue 10, May 2018

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Impact of Optimized Procedure-Related Factors in Drug-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

TM Rhee, JM Lee, ES Shin et al. Keywords: drug-eluting balloon; in-stent restenosis; paclitaxel-coated balloonpercutaneous coronary intervention; target lesion failure

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of optimizing procedure-related factors during drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty on clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (ISR).


BACKGOURND - Although DEB angioplasty is recommended as a reasonable option for ISR, recurrent target lesion failure (TLF) still occurs in many patients after DEB angioplasty.

METHODES - Consecutive patients with drug-eluting stent ISR treated with DEB (SeQuent Please) were collected from 4 centers in Korea. The primary outcome was 2-year TLF. Procedure-related modifiable independent predictors for TLF and their best cutoff values were determined.

RESULTS - In a total of 256 patients (309 lesions), TLF occurred in 52 patients (20.3%). Modifiable independent predictors of TLF among procedure-related factors were residual diameter stenosis after lesion preparation (residual percentage diameter stenosis [%DS]), DEB-to-stent ratio (BSR), and DEB inflation time (Tinflation), whose best cutoff values were 20%, 0.91, and 60 s, respectively. TLF rates were significantly higher in groups with residual %DS ≥20% (34.7% vs. 12.5%; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.86 to 2.48; p < 0.001), BSR ≤0.91 (46.4% vs. 21.9%; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.75 to 2.34; p < 0.001), and Tinflation ≤60 s (26.2% vs. 14.0%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.36 to 2.45; p < 0.001). When classifying ISR lesions by combination of procedure-related factors, TLF occurred in 8.3% in the fully optimized procedure group (residual %DS <20%, BSR >0.91, and Tinflation >60 s) and 66.7% in the nonoptimized group (residual %DS ≥20%, BSR ≤0.91, and Tinflation ≤60 s) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS - Residual %DS after lesion preparation, BSR, and Tinflation were the only modifiable procedure-related factors in DEB angioplasty. Fully optimized DEB angioplasty with optimal lesion preparation, prolonged inflation, and sufficient dilation may play an important role in reducing TLF after DEB angioplasty.