CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Fractional Flow Reserve

Abstract

Recommended Article

Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI Prognostic Implication of Thermodilution Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement Functional and morphological assessment of side branch after left main coronary artery bifurcation stenting with cross-over technique Clinical implications of three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease Combined Assessment of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Flow Measurement in the Coronary Sinus Improves Prediction of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease Experience With an On-Site Coronary Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Algorithm for the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses Diagnostic accuracy of instantaneous wave free-ratio in clinical practice Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation

Clinical TrialVolume 72, Issue 17, October 2018

JOURNAL:JACC Article Link

Prognostic Value of Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

AS Schuurman, MM Vroegindewey, I Kardys et al. Keywords: atherosclerotic burden; cardiovascular outcome; coronary plaque characteristics; intravascular ultrasound; radiofrequency prognosis

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - It has been shown that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and radiofrequency (RF-)IVUS can detect high-risk coronary plaque characteristics.


OBJECTIVES - The authors studied the long-term prognostic value of (RF-)IVUS-derived plaque characteristics in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing coronary angiography.


METHODS - From 2008 to 2011, (RF-)IVUS was performed in 1 nonstenotic segment of a nonculprit coronary artery in 581 patients undergoing coronary angiography for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable angina. The pre-defined primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal ACS, or unplanned revascularization. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for age, sex, and clinical risk factors.


RESULTS - During a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 152 patients (26.2%) had MACE. The presence of a lesion with a minimal luminal area ≤4.0 mm2 was independently associated with MACE (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.08; p = 0.020), whereas the presence of a thin-cap fibroatheroma lesion or a lesion with a plaque burden ≥70% on its own were not. Results were comparable when the composite endpoint included cardiac death instead of all-cause death. The presence of a lesion with a plaque burden of ≥70% was independently associated with the composite endpoint of cardiac death, nonfatal ACS, or unplanned revascularization after exclusion of culprit lesion-related events (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.58; p = 0.026). Likewise, each 10-U increase in segmental plaque burden was independently associated with a 26% increase in risk of this composite endpoint (HR: 1.26 per 10-U increase; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.52; p = 0.022).


CONCLUSIONS - IVUS-derived small luminal area and large plaque burden, and not RF-IVUS–derived compositional plaque features on their own, predict adverse cardiovascular outcome during long-term follow-up in patients with CAD. (The European Collaborative Project on Inflammation and Vascular Wall Remodeling in Atherosclerosis–Intravascular Ultrasound Study [AtheroRemoIVUS]; NCT01789411)