CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
HOME
CBS 2019
At CBS
General Information
Association and Affiliations
Organized by
Nanjing Heart Center
Asian Bifurcation Club (ABC)
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
Co-organized by
Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC)
Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center,National Health and Family Planning Commission (CBCEC)
American Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)
Asian Heart Society (AHS)
Contact Us
Registration Administration of Domestic Representatives
Hongjuan Peng :
+86-13913895477
Haimei Xu +86-13914736846
cbsnj@cbsmd.cn
Registration Administration of Overseas Representatives
Ling Lin : +86 (25) 52271398
+86-13951884596
cbs@cbsmd.cn
Management of Challenging Cases
Yingying Zhao :+86-13815408517
sub@cbsmd.cn
Address
CBS2019 Congress Secretariat, Nanjing First Hospital, Building No.9 68# Changle Road, Nanjing, China
210006
FACULTY
FACULTY
General Chairman
Congress Chairman
Education Center
Education Center
• Online Education (For more customized user interface with self-defined collection of research papers and education resources.)
• CBS Education Resource
• CBSMD Scientific Library
SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY
SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY
Research Paper
> Acute Coronary Syndrom
> ASCVD Prevention
> Bifurcation Stenting
> Cardio-Oncology
> Congestive Heart Failure
> DAPT Duration
> Drug Coated Balloon
> Fractional Flow Reserve
> IVUS Guidance
> Optical Coherence Tomography
> Pulmonary Hypertension
> Rotational Atherectomy
> Shear Stress
> Stenting Left Main
> Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
> Percutaneous LAA Occlusion
> Mitral/Tricuspid Valvular Disease
> Other Relevant Articles
Recommended Paper
Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic
COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-up
CSC Expert Consensus on Principles of Clinical Management of Patients with Severe Emergent Cardiovascular Diseases during the COVID-19 Epidemic
ACC Clinical Bulletin Focuses on Cardiac Implications of Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Fractional Flow Reserve
Clinical Trial2019 Apr 22;12(8):721-730.
JOURNAL：JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link
Kyhl K, Ahtarovski KA, Nepper-Christensen L et al. Keywords: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; acute myocardial infarction; cardiac function; cardiac remodeling; cardiovascular magnetic resonance; complete revascularization; culprit lesion; primary percutaneous coronary intervention; randomization; randomized study
OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization compared with culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on infarct size, left ventricular (LV), function, LV remodeling, and the presence of nonculprit infarctions.
BACKGROUND - Patients with STEMI with multivessel disease might have improved clinical outcomes after complete revascularization compared with PCI of the infarct-related artery only, but the impact on infarct size, LV function, and remodeling as well as the risk for periprocedural infarction are unknown.
METHODS - In this substudy of the DANAMI-3 (Third Danish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction)-PRIMULTI (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization) randomized trial, patients with STEMI with multivessel disease were randomized to receive either complete FFR-guided revascularization or PCI of the culprit vessel only. The patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during index admission and at 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS - A total of 280 patients (136 patients with infarct-related and 144 with complete FFR-guided revascularization) were included. There were no differences in final infarct size (median 12% [interquartile range: 5% to 19%] vs. 11% [interquartile range: 4% to 18%]; p = 0.62), myocardial salvage index (median 0.71 [interquartile range: 0.54 to 0.89] vs. 0.66 [interquartile range: 0.55 to 0.87]; p = 0.49), LV ejection fraction (mean 58 ± 9% vs. 59 ± 9%; p = 0.39), and LV end-systolic volume remodeling (mean 7 ± 22 ml vs. 7 ± 19 ml; p = 0.63). New nonculprit infarction occurring after the nonculprit intervention was numerically more frequent among patients treated with complete revascularization (6 [4.5%] vs. 1 [0.8%]; p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS - Complete FFR-guided revascularization in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease did not affect final infarct size, LV function, or remodeling compared with culprit-only PCI.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
中 文
CBS 2019
CBS 2019 FACULTY
Education Resource
CBSMD Scientific Library
