CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

急性冠脉综合征

Abstract

Recommended Article

An open-Label, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist and aspirin vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the AUGUSTUS trial Proportion and Morphological Features of Restenosis Lesions With Acute Coronary Syndrome in Different Timings of Target Lesion Revascularization After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Utility and Challenges of an Early Invasive Strategy in Patients Resuscitated From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Homeostatic Chemokines and Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Prevalence of Angina Among Primary Care Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Systems of Care for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association Switching P2Y12-receptor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit Lesion Only in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Substudy

Original Research2017 Dec 1;120(11):1920-1925

JOURNAL:Am J Cardiol. Article Link

Comparison of Accuracy of One-Use Methods for Calculating Fractional Flow Reserve by Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography to That Determined by the Pressure-Wire Method

Jang SJ, Ahn JM, Oh WY et al. Keywords: Calculating Fractional Flow Reserve; Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography; Pressure-Wire Method

ABSTRACT


Although the identification of the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions becomes important for revascularization strategy, the potential role of 3-dimensional high-resolution intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) for predicting functional significance of coronary lesions remains unclear. We assessed the diagnostic performance of 2 computational approaches for deriving fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular OCT images. We developed 2 methods to derive FFR-OCT by AFD (FFR-OCTAFD) and FFR-OCT by CFD (FFR-OCTCFD). Among 217 eligible patients between 2011 and 2014, 104 were included for data analysis (9 for derivation, 95 for validation). Luminal geometries from 3-dimensional OCT were used for both FFR-OCTAFD and FFR-OCTCFD calculations. The analytical fluid dynamics method calculated FFR from the blood flow resistance estimated using Poiseuille's law. For computational fluid dynamics, we numerically solved the Navier-Stokes equation in a steady-state flow with the distal porous media model for the capillary vessels. We examined the diagnostic performance of FFR-OCTAFD and FFR-OCTCFD compared with the pressure-wire measured FFR. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 86%, 65%, 94%, 81%, and 88% for FFR-OCTAFD and 86%, 73%, 91%, 76%, and 90% for FFR-OCTCFD. The area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.88 for FFR-OCTAFD and 0.86 for FFR-OCTCFD. FFR-OCTAFD and FFR-OCTCFD showed a strong linear correlation with the measured FFR (r = 0.631; p <0.001, r = 0.655; p <0.001, respectively). FFR derived from high-resolution volumetric OCT images showed high diagnostic performance for the detection of coronary ischemia. In conclusion, OCT-derived FFR may be useful for guiding the management of coronary artery disease.


Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.