CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract

Recommended Article

Prognostic Effect and Longitudinal Hemodynamic Assessment of Borderline Pulmonary Hypertension Pulmonary Artery Denervation: A New, Long-Awaited Interventional Treatment for Combined Pre- and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension? Advances in therapeutic interventions for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension Identifying At-Risk Patients with Combined Pre- and Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension Using Interventricular Septal Angle at Cardiac MRI Medical Therapy for CTEPH: Is There Still Space for More? Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension Immunotherapy of Endothelin-1 Receptor Type A for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Circulating Plasma microRNAs In Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Original Research2012 Nov 22;8(7):823-9.

JOURNAL:EuroIntervention. Article Link

Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study

Prati F, Di Vito L, Biondi-Zoccai G et al. Keywords: stent; percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; coronary artery disease; angiography; optical coherence tomography

ABSTRACT


AIMS - Angiographic guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has substantial limitations. The superior spatial resolution of optical coherence tomography (OCT) could translate into meaningful clinical benefits. We aimed to compare angiographic guidance alone versus angiographic plus OCT guidance for PCI.


METHODS AND RESULTS - Patients undergoing PCI with angiographic plus OCT guidance (OCT group) were compared with matched patients undergoing PCI with angiographic only guidance (Angio group) within 30 days. The primary endpoint was the one-year rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI). A total of 670 patients were included, 335 in the OCT group and 335 in the Angio group. OCT disclosed adverse features requiring further interventions in 34.7%. Unadjusted analyses showed that the OCT group had a significantly lower one-year risk of cardiac death (1.2% vs. 4.5%, p=0.010), cardiac death or MI (6.6% vs. 13.0%, p=0.006), and the composite of cardiac death, MI, or repeat revascularisation (9.6% vs. 14.8%, p=0.044). Angiographic plus OCT guidance was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac death or MI even at extensive multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline and procedural differences between the groups (OR=0.49 [0.25-0.96], p=0.037) and at propensity-score adjusted analyses.


CONCLUSIONS - This observational study, the first ever formally to appraise OCT guidance for PCI decision-making, suggests that the use of OCT can improve clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI.