CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

经导管主动脉瓣置换

Abstract

Recommended Article

Comparison of Early Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following TAVR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Right ventricular function and outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of Myval transcatheter heart valve versus contemporary transcatheter heart valves in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis: the LANDMARK trial Coronary Access After TAVR With a Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis: Insights From Computed Tomography Anticoagulation with or without Clopidogrel after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation Valve‐in‐Valve for Degenerated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve‐in‐Valve for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A 3‐Center Comparison of Hemodynamic and 1‐Year Outcome Anticoagulation After Surgical or Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement

Original ResearchVolume 73, Issue 6, February 2019

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Impact of Abnormal Coronary Reactivity on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Women

AlBadri A, Bairey Merz CN, Johnson BD et al. Keywords: cardiovascular outcome; coronary flow reserve; coronary reactivity; endothelial function; microvasculature

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Currently as many as one-half of women with suspected myocardial ischemia have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), and abnormal coronary reactivity (CR) is commonly found.

 

OBJECTIVES - The authors prospectively investigated CR and longer-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with and with no obstructive CAD in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutesponsored WISE (Womens Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study.

 

METHODS - Women (n = 224) with signs and symptoms of ischemia underwent CR testing. Coronary flow reserve and coronary blood flow were obtained to test microvascular function, whereas epicardial CR was tested by coronary dilation response to intracoronary (IC) acetylcholine and IC nitroglycerin. All-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure), and angina hospitalizations served as clinical outcomes over a median follow-up of 9.7 years.

 

RESULTS - The authors identified 129 events during the follow-up period. Low coronary flow reserve was a predictor of increased MACE rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.12; p = 0.021), whereas low coronary blood flow was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.24; p = 0.038) and MACE (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.20; p = 0.006) after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. In addition, a decrease in cross-sectional area in response to IC acetylcholine was associated with higher hazard of angina hospitalization (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.07; p < 0.0001). There was no association between epicardial IC-nitroglycerin dilation and outcomes.

 

CONCLUSIONS - On longer-term follow-up, impaired microvascular function predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia. Evaluation of CR abnormality can identify those at higher risk of adverse outcomes in the absence of significant CAD. (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE]; NCT00000554)