CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

推荐文献

科研文章

荐读文献

Discharge Against Medical Advice After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Cardiovascular Biomarkers and Imaging in Older Adults: JACC Council Perspectives Microthrombi As A Major Cause of Cardiac Injury in COVID-19: A Pathologic Study Frequency, Regional Variation, and Predictors of Undetermined Cause of Death in Cardiometabolic Clinical Trials: A Pooled Analysis of 9259 Deaths in 9 Trials Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials When high‐volume PCI operators in high‐volume hospitals move to lower volume hospitals—Do they still maintain high volume and quality of outcomes? Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmissions Where Are the Solutions? The Prognostic Value of Exercise Echocardiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis

Original ResearchVolume 72, Issue 19, November 2018

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Healthy Behavior, Risk Factor Control, and Survival in the COURAGE Trial

DJ Maron, GBJ Mancini, COURAGE Trial Group et al. Keywords: guideline-directed medical therapy; lifestyle; optimal medical therapy; secondary prevention; stable ischemic heart disease

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Individual risk factor control improves survival in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). It is uncertain if multiple risk factor control further extends survival.

Objectives This study determined whether a greater number of risk factors at goal predicted improved survival in SIHD patients.

 

METHODS - Of 2,287 participants in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial, 2,102 (92%) had complete ascertainment of 6 pre-specified risk factors: systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, physical activity, diet, and body mass index. Participants received interventions to control these risk factors. The outcome measure was mortality.

 

RESULTS - During a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, 473 (22.5%) subjects died. In univariate analysis, the greater the number of risk factors controlled, the higher the probability of survival (unadjusted log rank: p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors at 1 year of improved survival were being a nonsmoker, regular physical activity, having a systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg, and following the American Heart Association Step 2 diet. Baseline risk factor values and evidence-based medications did not independently predict survival once risk factor control at 1 year was included in the model. Having 4 to 6 risk factors compared with 0 to 1 risk factor at goal predicted lower mortality (hazard ratios for 4 and 6 controlled risk factors: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.41 to 0.98, and 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.09 to 0.79, respectively).


CONCLUSIONS - The greater the number of risk factors in control, the higher the probability of survival in patients with SIHD. More effective strategies are needed to achieve comprehensive risk factor control, including healthy behaviors. (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation [COURAGE]; NCT00007657)