CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

推荐文献

科研文章

荐读文献

Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization Novel functions of macrophages in the heart: insights into electrical conduction, stress, and diastolic dysfunction Improving the Design of Future PCI Trials for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Position paper of the EACVI and EANM on artificial intelligence applications in multimodality cardiovascular imaging using SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and cardiac CT Comparison of Heart Team vs Interventional Cardiologist Recommendations for the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease State of the Art in Noninvasive Imaging of Ischemic Heart Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Women: Indications, Performance, and Limitations Effect of a Home-Based Wearable Continuous ECG Monitoring Patch on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation The mSToPS Randomized Clinical Trial Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media Influence of LDL-Cholesterol Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Coronary Revascularization Mortality Differences Associated With Treatment Responses in CANTOS and FOURIER: Insights and Implications

Review ArticleVolume 76, Issue 4, July 2020

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Improving the Design of Future PCI Trials for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

G Marquis-Gravel, DJ Moliterno, SG Goodman et al. Keywords: PCI; trail design; SCAD

ABSTRACT

The role of percutaneous coronary interventions in addition to medical therapy for patients with stable coronary artery disease continues to be debated in routine clinical practice, despite more than 2 decades of randomized controlled trials. The residual uncertainty arises from particular challenges facing revascularization trials. Which endpoint do doctors care about, and which do patients care about? Which participants should be enrolled? What background medical therapy should we use? When is placebo control relevant? In this paper, we discuss how these questions can be approached and examine the merits and disadvantages of possible options. Engaging multiple stakeholders, including patients, researchers, regulators, and funders, to ensure the design elements are methodologically valid and clinically meaningful should be an aspirational goal in the development of future trials.