CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

推荐文献

科研文章

荐读文献

A Test in Context: E/A and E/e' to Assess Diastolic Dysfunction and LV Filling Pressure Geometry as a Confounder When Assessing Ventricular Systolic Function: Comparison Between Ejection Fraction and Strain Long-Term Outcomes in Women and Men Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Basic Biology of Oxidative Stress and the Cardiovascular System: Part 1 of a 3-Part Series Heart Failure With Preserved, Borderline, and Reduced Ejection Fraction: 5-Year Outcomes A Combination of Allogeneic Stem Cells Promotes Cardiac Regeneration Pulmonary Artery Pressure-Guided Management of Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Association Between Living in Food Deserts and Cardiovascular Risk 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Burden of 30-Day Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 833,344 Patients in the United States: Predictors, Causes, and Cost

ConsensusOctober 10, 2017, Volume 136, Issue 15

JOURNAL:Circulation. Article Link

Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

AHA Scientific Statements Keywords: AHA Scientific Statements; delivery of health care; disease management; shock, cardiogenic

ABSTRACT

Cardiogenic shock is a high-acuity, potentially complex, and hemodynamically diverse state of end-organ hypoperfusion that is frequently associated with multisystem organ failure. Despite improving survival in recent years, patient morbidity and mortality remain high, and there are few evidence-based therapeutic interventions known to clearly improve patient outcomes. This scientific statement on cardiogenic shock summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, causes, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock; reviews contemporary best medical, surgical, mechanical circulatory support, and palliative care practices; advocates for the development of regionalized systems of care; and outlines future research priorities.