CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

左主干支架

科研文章

荐读文献

Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Sex differences in left main coronary artery stenting: Different characteristics but similar outcomes for women compared with men Long-Term Outcomes After PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease According to Lesion Location Clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents or first-generation Paclitaxel-eluting stents for unprotected left main disease Complex PCI procedures: challenges for the interventional cardiologist Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study Expansion or contraction of stenting in coronary artery disease? Revascularization in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: Results From the EXCEL Trial
|<<... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...>>|

Review Article2018 Mar 23;20(5):29.

JOURNAL：Curr Cardiol Rep. Article Link

Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Kanmanthareddy A, Anugula D, Kar B. Keywords: Hemodynamic support; High-risk intervention; Left main; Operator experience; Percutaneous coronary intervention

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW - This review was performed with the goal of summarizing the role of operator experience in the treatment of severe left main stenosis by percutaneous intervention techniques.


RECENT FINDINGS - The Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting had similar clinical outcomes for severe left main disease. However, PCI of the left main coronary stenosis is considered to be a high-risk intervention because of the large area of myocardium at jeopardy that can quickly cause hemodynamic compromise. Operator experience and familiarity with the use of hemodynamic support devices, plaque modification techniques, and intravascular imaging tools is associated with better clinical outcomes. In patients with severe left main stenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by high-volume operators, the clinical outcomes are superior.
>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 注册

> CBS 2019 会议日程

> CBS 2019 学术征集

> CBS 2019 热点

 CBSMD

> CBSMD 网站注册

> 教育中心

> 荐读文献

> Top 10 阅读文献

> 文献导读
CBS 2019 CBS 2019 主席团 教育中心 科研动态
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top