CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

Acute Coronary Syndrom

科研文章

荐读文献

Prognostic and Practical Validation of Current Definitions of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Dynamic Myocardial Ultrasound Localization Angiography Efficacy and Safety of Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The Prognostic Significance of Periprocedural Infarction in the Era of Potent Antithrombotic Therapy: The PRAGUE-18 Substudy Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial Prognostic Value of SYNTAX Score in Patients With Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial Timing of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Administration in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Comparison in prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcome of VSR versus FWR after acute myocardial infarction: The prospective, multicenter registry MOODY trial-heart rupture analysis Red Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Diabetes and Myocardial Infarction: an analysis from the EXAMINE trial Association Between Haptoglobin Phenotype and Microvascular Obstruction in Patients With STEMI: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study

Original Research2018 Mar;107(3):233-240.

JOURNAL:Clin Res Cardiol. Article Link

Prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II trial

de Waha S, Schoene K, Thiele H et al. Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; atrial fibrillation; cardiogenic shock; IABP-SHOCK II trial; prognosis

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Aim of the current study was to analyse the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which has never been investigated yet.


METHODS - The current analysis is a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II trial. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of AF. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30-day follow-up. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation, and stroke at 12 months.

 

RESULTS - AF was documented in 28.2% (n = 169) of all 600 patients initially enrolled in the IABP-SHOCK II trial. There were no significant differences with respect to mortality at 30 days and 12 months between patients with and without AF (p = 0.81, p = 0.74). Similarly, the rates of recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation, and stroke did not differ between groups (all p > 0.05). There was no interaction of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) and no IABP in patients with or without AF with respect to clinical outcome at 30 days and 12 months (p > 0.05).

 

CONCLUSION - AF is not associated with clinical outcome at 30 days and 12 months in CS complicating AMI.