CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

急性冠脉综合征

科研文章

荐读文献

Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest Prevalence of Angina Among Primary Care Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Eruptive Calcified Nodules as a Potential Mechanism of Acute Coronary Thrombosis and Sudden Death Homeostatic Chemokines and Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Acute Myocardial Injury in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection: A Review Association Between Haptoglobin Phenotype and Microvascular Obstruction in Patients With STEMI: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study Invasive Versus Medical Management in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With a Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Association of Thrombus Aspiration With Time and Mortality Among Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized TOTAL Trial Considerations for Single-Measurement Risk-Stratification Strategies for Myocardial Infarction Using Cardiac Troponin Assays Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trial2018 Jul 19.[Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Circulation. Article Link

Mild Hypothermia in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction - The Randomized SHOCK-COOL Trial

Fuernau G, Beck J, Thiele H et al. Keywords: Acute Coronary Syndromes, Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Acute Heart Failure, Interventions and ACS

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Experimental trials suggest improved outcome by mild therapeutic hypothermia for cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to investigate hemodynamic effects of mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.


METHODS - Patients (n=40) with cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention without classical indication for mild therapeutic hypothermia underwent randomization in a 1:1 fashion to mild therapeutic hypothermia for 24 h or control. The primary endpoint was cardiac power index at 24 h; secondary endpoints included other hemodynamic parameters as well as serial measurements of arterial lactate.


RESULTS - No relevant differences were observed for the primary endpoint cardiac power index at 24 h (mild therapeutic hypothermia vs. control: 0.41 [interquartile range 0.31-0.52] vs. 0.36 [inter-quartile range 0.31-0.48] W/m2; p=0.50, median difference -0.025 [95% confidence interval -0.12 to 0.06 W/m2]). Similarly, all other hemodynamic measurements were not statistically different. Arterial lactate levels at 6, 8 and 10 hours were significantly higher in patients in the MTH group with a slower decline (p for interaction 0.03). There were no differences in 30-day mortality: (60 vs. 50%, hazard ratio 1.27 [95% confidence interval 0.55-2.94]; p=0.55).


CONCLUSIONS - In this randomized trial mild therapeutic hypothermia failed to show a substantial beneficial effect in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction on cardiac power index at 24 h.


CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION - URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01890317.