CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

急性冠脉综合征

科研文章

荐读文献

Antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease Open sesame technique in percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification With a Single Measurement of High-Sensitivity Troponin I The (R)Evolution of the CICU - Better for the Patient, Better for Education Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Red Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Diabetes and Myocardial Infarction: an analysis from the EXAMINE trial Management of Myocardial Revascularization Failure: An Expert Consensus Document of the EAPCI Nonculprit Lesion Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With STEMI: The EXPLORE Trial Pharmacotherapy in the Management of Anxiety and Pain During Acute Coronary Syndromes and the Risk of Developing Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Original Research2015 Aug 7;351:h3913.

JOURNAL:BMJ. Article Link

Comparison of hospital variation in acute myocardial infarction care and outcome between Sweden and United Kingdom: population based cohort study using nationwide clinical registries

Chung SC, Sundström J, Gale CP et al. Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; hospital variation; population based cohort

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVE - To assess the between hospital variation in use of guideline recommended treatments and clinical outcomes for acute myocardial infarction in Sweden and the United Kingdom.


DESIGN - Population based longitudinal cohort study using nationwide clinical registries.


SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS - Nationwide registry data comprising all hospitals providing acute myocardial infarction care in Sweden (SWEDEHEART/RIKS-HIA, n=87; 119,786 patients) and the UK (NICOR/MINAP, n=242; 391,077 patients), 2004-10.


MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES - Between hospital variation in 30 day mortality of patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction.


RESULTS - Case mix standardised 30 day mortality from acute myocardial infarction was lower in Swedish hospitals (8.4%) than in UK hospitals (9.7%), with less variation between hospitals (interquartile range 2.6% v 3.5%). In both countries, hospital level variation and 30 day mortality were inversely associated with provision of guideline recommended care. Compared with the highest quarter, hospitals in the lowest quarter for use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention had higher volume weighted 30 day mortality for ST elevation myocardial infarction (10.7% v 6.6% in Sweden; 12.7% v 5.8% in the UK). The adjusted odds ratio comparing the highest with the lowest quarters for hospitals' use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.79) in Sweden and 0.68 (0.60 to 0.76) in the UK. Differences in risk between hospital quarters of treatment for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and secondary prevention drugs for all discharged acute myocardial infarction patients were smaller than for reperfusion treatment in both countries.


CONCLUSION - Between hospital variation in 30 day mortality for acute myocardial infarction was greater in the UK than in Sweden. This was associated with, and may be partly accounted for by, the higher practice variation in acute myocardial infarction guideline recommended treatment in the UK hospitals. High quality healthcare across all hospitals, especially in the UK, with better use of guideline recommended treatment, may not only reduce unacceptable practice variation but also deliver improved clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Clinical trials registration Clinical trials NCT01359033.