CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

急性冠脉综合征

科研文章

荐读文献

Dynamic Myocardial Ultrasound Localization Angiography Cardiac monocytes and macrophages after myocardial infarction Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Switching P2Y12-receptor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease Systems of Care for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association Natural History of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection With Spontaneous Angiographic Healing Precisely Tuned Inhibition of HIF Prolyl Hydroxylases Is Key for Cardioprotection After Ischemia Successful catheter ablation of electrical storm after myocardial infarction Macrophage MST1/2 Disruption Impairs Post-Infarction Cardiac Repair via LTB4 Homeostatic Chemokines and Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Clinical Trial2020 Aug 18;76(7):812-824.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest

K Ameloot, P Jakkula, J Hästbacka et al. Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; cardiac arrest; cardiogenic shock

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - In patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the optimal level of pharmacologic support is unknown. Whereas higher doses may increase myocardial oxygen consumption and induce arrhythmias, diastolic hypotension may reduce coronary perfusion and increase infarct size.

 

OBJECTIVES - This study aimed to determine the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with AMI and shock after cardiac arrest.

 

METHODS - This study used patient-level pooled analysis of post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI randomized in the Neuroprotect (Neuroprotective Goal Directed Hemodynamic Optimization in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients; NCT02541591) and COMACARE (Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen and Mean Arterial Pressure After Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation; NCT02698917) trials who were randomized to MAP 65 mm Hg or MAP 80/85 to 100 mm Hg targets during the first 36 h after admission. The primary endpoint was the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve.

 

RESULTS - Of 235 patients originally randomized, 120 patients had AMI with shock. Patients assigned to the higher MAP target (n = 58) received higher doses of norepinephrine (p = 0.004) and dobutamine (p = 0.01) and reached higher MAPs (86 ± 9 mm Hg vs. 72 ± 10 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Whereas admission hemodynamics and angiographic findings were all well-balanced and revascularization was performed equally effective, the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve was lower in patients assigned to the higher MAP target (median: 1.14 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.35 to 2.31 μg.72 h/l] vs. median: 1.56 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.61 to 4.72 μg. 72 h/l]; p = 0.04). Additional pharmacologic support did not increase the risk of a new cardiac arrest (p = 0.88) or atrial fibrillation (p = 0.94). Survival with good neurologic outcome at 180 days was not different between both groups (64% vs. 53%, odds ratio: 1.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 3.22).

 

CONCLUSIONS - In post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI, targeting MAP between 80/85 and 100 mm Hg with additional use of inotropes and vasopressors was associated with smaller myocardial injury.