CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

DAPT Duration

Abstract

Recommended Article

State of the art: duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary stent implantation – past, present and future perspectives A prospective, randomized, open-label trial of 6-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the Rationale and design of the comparison between a P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing implantation of coronary drug-eluting stents (SMART-CHOICE): A prospective multicenter randomized trial One-year outcome of a prospective trial stopping dual antiplatelet therapy at 3 months after everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent implantation: ShortT and OPtimal duration of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy after everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent (STOPDAPT) trial Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation After Coronary Stenting in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulation Six Versus 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: Randomized Substudy of the I-LOVE-IT 2 Trial A Genotype-Guided Strategy for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Primary PCI Mortality Following Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events Occurring Beyond 1 Year After Coronary Stenting - A Secondary Analysis of the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 10, May 2019

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation and Cardiovascular Risk in Relation to Age: Analysis From the PARIS Registry

Joyce LC, Baber U, Mehran R et al. Keywords: DAPT; therapy cessation; PCI; age

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES- The aim of this study was to examine the association between dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation and cardiovascular risk after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to age.

 

BACKGROUND - Examination of outcomes by age after percutaneous coronary intervention is relevant given the aging population.

 

METHODS- Two-year clinical outcomes, incidence, and effect of DAPT cessation on outcomes were compared by ages 55, 56 to 74, and 75 years from the PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Antiplatelet Regimens in Stented Patients) registry. DAPT cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation, interruption for surgery, and disruption (from noncompliance or bleeding). Clinical endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), a secondary restrictive definition of MACE (MACE2) excluding target lesion revascularization, and bleeding.

 

RESULTS - A total of 1,192 patients (24%) were 55 years, 2,869 (57%) were 56 to 74 years, and 957 (19%) were 75 years of age. Patients 75 years of age had higher DAPT cessation rates and increased risk for MACE2, death, cardiac death, and bleeding compared with younger patients. Discontinuation and interruption were not associated with increased cardiovascular risk across age groups, whereas disruption was associated with increased risk for MACE and MACE2 in younger patients but not in patients 75 years of age (p for trend <0.05).

 

CONCLUSIONS- Nonadherence and outcomes vary by age, with patients 75 years having the highest DAPT cessation rates. We observed no association between outcomes and DAPT cessation in patients 75 years, whereas discontinuation was associated with lower MACE rates and disruption with increased MACE rates in patients <75 years.