CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

DAPT Duration

Abstract

Recommended Article

Stopping or continuing clopidogrel 12 months after drug-eluting stent placement: the OPTIDUAL randomized trial ISAR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting Second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation followed by 6- versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy: the SECURITY randomized clinical trial 6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial Cost-Effectiveness of Different Durations of Dual-Antiplatelet Use After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Long Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Rationale and design of a prospective substudy of clinical endpoint adjudication processes within an investigator-reported randomised controlled trial in patients with coronary artery disease: the GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-StudY (GLASSY) Individualized antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent deployment: Implication of clinical trials of different durations of dual antiplatelet therapy

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 10, May 2019

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation and Cardiovascular Risk in Relation to Age: Analysis From the PARIS Registry

Joyce LC, Baber U, Mehran R et al. Keywords: DAPT; therapy cessation; PCI; age

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES- The aim of this study was to examine the association between dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation and cardiovascular risk after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to age.

 

BACKGROUND - Examination of outcomes by age after percutaneous coronary intervention is relevant given the aging population.

 

METHODS- Two-year clinical outcomes, incidence, and effect of DAPT cessation on outcomes were compared by ages 55, 56 to 74, and 75 years from the PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Antiplatelet Regimens in Stented Patients) registry. DAPT cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation, interruption for surgery, and disruption (from noncompliance or bleeding). Clinical endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), a secondary restrictive definition of MACE (MACE2) excluding target lesion revascularization, and bleeding.

 

RESULTS - A total of 1,192 patients (24%) were 55 years, 2,869 (57%) were 56 to 74 years, and 957 (19%) were 75 years of age. Patients 75 years of age had higher DAPT cessation rates and increased risk for MACE2, death, cardiac death, and bleeding compared with younger patients. Discontinuation and interruption were not associated with increased cardiovascular risk across age groups, whereas disruption was associated with increased risk for MACE and MACE2 in younger patients but not in patients 75 years of age (p for trend <0.05).

 

CONCLUSIONS- Nonadherence and outcomes vary by age, with patients 75 years having the highest DAPT cessation rates. We observed no association between outcomes and DAPT cessation in patients 75 years, whereas discontinuation was associated with lower MACE rates and disruption with increased MACE rates in patients <75 years.