CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

光学相关断层扫描

Abstract

Recommended Article

Randomized comparison of stent strut coverage following angiography- or optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention Vascular response and healing profile of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: A one-year optical coherence tomography analysis from the GHOST-CTO registry Clinical Predictors for Lack of Favorable Vascular Response to Statin Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Serial Optical Coherence Tomography Study Covering our tracks – optical coherence tomography to assess vascular healing Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention Assessment of the coronary calcification by optical coherence tomography A Survey on Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Tissue Characterization in Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Intravascular optical coherence tomography
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>|

Original Research2019 Mar 27. [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL：Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Characteristics of abnormal post-stent optical coherence tomography findings in hemodialysis patients

Matsuhiro Y, Matsunaga-Lee Y, Nakamura D et al. Keywords: chronic renal disease; coronary artery disease; OCT; stents

ABSTRACT

AIM - Clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in hemodialysis (HD) patients are significantly worse than those in non-HD patients. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high resolution imaging modality and provides a detailed assessment of post-interventional abnormal findings that influence worse clinical outcomes. However, little is known about the abnormal post-stent OCT findings in HD patients. Therefore, in this study, we compared the abnormal post-stent OCT findings between HD and non-HD patients.


METHODS - One hundred thirty-nine consecutive OCT guided PCI (21 lesions in HD patients and 118 lesions in non-HD patients) were enrolled. We compared the post-stent OCT findings, including the edge dissections, under expansion index (minimum stent area/mean reference area), and stent eccentricity index (minimum stent diameter/maximum stent diameter) between HD and non-HD patients. We also compared the device-oriented clinical events (DoCEs) at 8 months of follow up.


RESULTS - There was a significantly higher prevalence of distal edge dissections (16.7% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.011) in HD patients. HD patients had a significantly lower under expansion index (0.76 ± 0.21 vs. 0.85 ± 0.14, P = 0.029) and stent eccentricity index (0.82 ± 0.09 vs. 0.88 ± 0.18, P = 0.018). The cumulative rate of DoCEs was significantly higher in the HD patients (23.8% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.013).


CONCLUSIONS - A higher prevalence of distal edge dissections, under expansion and stent eccentricity were detected by the detailed OCT findings in HD patients.

 

© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top