CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

经导管主动脉瓣置换

Abstract

Recommended Article

Delirium After TAVR: Crosspassing the Limit of Resilience Clinical impact of conduction disturbances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Role of Multimodality Imaging in Common and Complex Clinical Scenarios Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following TAVR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Anticoagulation with or without Clopidogrel after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation Randomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: REFLECT II Anticoagulation After Surgical or Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement Impact of myocardial fibrosis on left ventricular remodelling, recovery, and outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in different haemodynamic subtypes of severe aortic stenosis

Original Research2020 Jul 5;S0167-5273(20)33411-2.

JOURNAL:Int J Cardiol . Article Link

Long-term outcome of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

M Compagnone, G Marchetti, F Saia et al. Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; degenerated aortic valve bioprosthesis; prosthesis-patient mismatch; TAVR

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Incidence and long-term clinical consequences of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are still unclear.


METHODS - We enrolled 710 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR. PPM was defined as absent if the index orifice area (iEOA) was >0.85 cm2/m2, moderate if the iEOA was between 0.65 and 0.85 cm2/m2 or severe if the iEOA was <0.65 cm2/m2.

RESULTS - Among the 566 patients fulfilling the study criteria, the distribution of PPM was as follows: 50.5% none ( n = 286), 43% moderate PPM ( n = 243) and 6.5% severe PPM ( n = 37). At 5-year follow-up, patients with severe PPM had a significantly higher incidence of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction and stroke ( p = .025) compared with the other patients. After adjusting the results for possible confounders, severe PPM remained an independent predictor of long-term adverse outcome (HR: 2.46; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.10–5.53). The independent predictors of severe PPM were valve-in-valve procedure and body mass index. Balloon-expandable valves were not associated with higher rates of severe PPM in comparison with self-expandable valves (5% vs. 8%, respectively, p = .245).


CONCLUSIONS -In our study severe PPM emerged as a risk factor for long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.