CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

经导管主动脉瓣置换

Abstract

Recommended Article

Thrombotic Versus Bleeding Risk After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: JACC Review Topic of the Week Extracellular Myocardial Volume in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Computed tomography angiography-derived extracellular volume fraction predicts early recovery of left ventricular systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Temporal Trends, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Contemporary Presentation and Management of Valvular Heart Disease: The EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II Survey Determinants and Impact of Heart Failure Readmission Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Ascending Aortic Length and Risk of Aortic Adverse Events: The Neglected Dimension Minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The new standard for surgeons and cardiologists using transfemoral access?

Original Research2020 Jul 5;S0167-5273(20)33411-2.

JOURNAL:Int J Cardiol . Article Link

Long-term outcome of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

M Compagnone, G Marchetti, F Saia et al. Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; degenerated aortic valve bioprosthesis; prosthesis-patient mismatch; TAVR

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Incidence and long-term clinical consequences of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are still unclear.


METHODS - We enrolled 710 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR. PPM was defined as absent if the index orifice area (iEOA) was >0.85 cm2/m2, moderate if the iEOA was between 0.65 and 0.85 cm2/m2 or severe if the iEOA was <0.65 cm2/m2.

RESULTS - Among the 566 patients fulfilling the study criteria, the distribution of PPM was as follows: 50.5% none ( n = 286), 43% moderate PPM ( n = 243) and 6.5% severe PPM ( n = 37). At 5-year follow-up, patients with severe PPM had a significantly higher incidence of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction and stroke ( p = .025) compared with the other patients. After adjusting the results for possible confounders, severe PPM remained an independent predictor of long-term adverse outcome (HR: 2.46; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.10–5.53). The independent predictors of severe PPM were valve-in-valve procedure and body mass index. Balloon-expandable valves were not associated with higher rates of severe PPM in comparison with self-expandable valves (5% vs. 8%, respectively, p = .245).


CONCLUSIONS -In our study severe PPM emerged as a risk factor for long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.