CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Radial Versus Femoral Access for Rotational Atherectomy: A UK Observational Study of 8622 Patients Thirty-Day Outcomes Following Transfemoral Transseptal Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Intrepid TMVR Early Feasibility Study Results Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis Novel percutaneous interventional therapies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an integrative review Relation between baseline plaque features and subsequent coronary artery remodeling determined by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound Physiologic Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Discordance Between FFR and iFR The EBC TWO Study (European Bifurcation Coronary TWO): A Randomized Comparison of Provisional T-Stenting Versus a Systematic 2 Stent Culotte Strategy in Large Caliber True Bifurcations
|<<... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ...>>|

Original Research2017 Dec;10(12).

JOURNAL：Circ Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Radial Versus Femoral Access for Rotational Atherectomy: A UK Observational Study of 8622 Patients

Watt J, Austin D, Mackay D et al. Keywords: access site; atherectomy; hemorrhage; radial artery

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an important interventional tool for heavily calcified coronary lesions. We compared the early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RA using radial or femoral access.


METHODS AND RESULTS - We identified all patients in England and Wales who underwent RA between January 1, 2005, and March 31, 2014. Eight thousand six hundred twenty-two RA cases (3069 radial and 5553 femoral) were included in the analysis. The study primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Propensity scores were calculated to determine the factors associated with treatment assignment to radial or femoral access. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, using the calculated propensity scores, was performed. Thirty-day mortality was 2.2% in the radial and 2.3% in the femoral group (P=0.76). Radial access was associated with equivalent 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.46; P=0.71), procedural success (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29; P=0.73), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.80-1.38; P=0.72), and net adverse clinical events (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71-1.15; P=0.41), but lower rates of in-hospital major bleeding (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.98; P=0.04) and major access site complications (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.38; P=0.004), compared with femoral access.


CONCLUSIONS - In this large real-world study of patients undergoing RA, radial access was associated with equivalent 30-day mortality and procedural success, but reduced major bleeding and access site complications, compared with femoral access.


© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top