CBS - The 17th Left Main & Coronary Bifurcation Summit, CBS2025

HOME
CBS 2019
At CBS

General Information

Left Main & Coronary Bifurcation Summit (CBS) was founded in 2006 as a think tank dedicated to the treatment of left main and coronary bifurcation lesions. CBS aims to improve cardiological care by refreshing fundamental researches, clinical trials, yearly published guidelines, emerged ideas and case-based discussion.

Association and Affiliations
- Organized by
  
  Nanjing Heart Center
  
  Asian Bifurcation Club (ABC)
  
  Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
- Co-organized by
  
  Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC)
  
  Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center,National Health and Family Planning Commission (CBCEC)
  
  American Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)
  
  Asian Heart Society (AHS)
Contact Us
- Registration Administration of Domestic Representatives
  
  Hongjuan Peng : +86-13913895477
  
  Haimei Xu +86-13914736846
  
  cbsnj@cbsmd.cn
- Registration Administration of Overseas Representatives
  
  Ling Lin : +86 (25) 52271398
  
  +86-13951884596
  
  cbs@cbsmd.cn
- Management of Challenging Cases
  
  Yingying Zhao :+86-13815408517
  
  sub@cbsmd.cn
Address

CBS2019 Congress Secretariat, Nanjing First Hospital, Building No.9 68# Changle Road, Nanjing, China

210006
FACULTY
FACULTY

General Chairman
Congress Chairman
Course Directors International Faculty Domestic Faculty Hong Kong and Taiwan Faculty Members of Academic Committee
Education Center

Education Center

• Online Education (For more customized user interface with self-defined collection of research papers and education resources.)

• CBS Education Resource

• CBSMD Scientific Library
SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY

SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY

Research Paper

> Acute Coronary Syndrom

> ASCVD Prevention

> Bifurcation Stenting

> Cardio-Oncology

> Congestive Heart Failure

> DAPT Duration

> Drug Coated Balloon

> Fractional Flow Reserve

> IVUS Guidance

> Optical Coherence Tomography

> Pulmonary Hypertension

> Rotational Atherectomy

> Shear Stress

> Stenting Left Main

> Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

> Percutaneous LAA Occlusion

> Mitral/Tricuspid Valvular Disease

> Other Relevant Articles

Recommended Paper

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-up

CSC Expert Consensus on Principles of Clinical Management of Patients with Severe Emergent Cardiovascular Diseases during the COVID-19 Epidemic

ACC Clinical Bulletin Focuses on Cardiac Implications of Coronavirus (COVID-19)

HOME | SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY | Scientific Library

Scientific Library

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial Left Main Revascularization in 2017 Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Combined use of OCT and IVUS in spontaneous coronary artery dissection 2021 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Heart Failure) Left-main restenosis in the DES era-a call for action Elaborately Engineering a Self-Indicating Dual-Drug Nanoassembly for Site-Specific Photothermal-Potentiated Thrombus Penetration and Thrombolysis Differences between the left main and other bifurcations Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial) Results From the OPINION Imaging Study

Sort by hits |<<... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ...>>|

Clinical Trial2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752.

JOURNAL：Lancet. Article Link

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Mäkikallio T, Holm NR, NOBLE study investigators et al. Keywords: PCI; CABG; noninferiority

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard treatment for revascularisation in patients with left main coronary artery disease, but use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for this indication is increasing. We aimed to compare PCI and CABG for treatment of left main coronary artery disease.

METHODS - In this prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients with left main coronary artery disease were enrolled in 36 centres in northern Europe and randomised 1:1 to treatment with PCI or CABG. Eligible patients had stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Exclusion criteria were ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 24 h, being considered too high risk for CABG or PCI, or expected survival of less than 1 year. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause mortality, non-procedural myocardial infarction, any repeat coronary revascularisation, and stroke. Non-inferiority of PCI to CABG required the lower end of the 95% CI not to exceed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1·35 after up to 5 years of follow-up. The intention-to-treat principle was used in the analysis if not specified otherwise. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, number NCT01496651.

FINDINGS - Between Dec 9, 2008, and Jan 21, 2015, 1201 patients were randomly assigned, 598 to PCI and 603 to CABG, and 592 in each group entered analysis by intention to treat. Kaplan-Meier 5 year estimates of MACCE were 29% for PCI (121 events) and 19% for CABG (81 events), HR 1·48 (95% CI 1·11-1·96), exceeding the limit for non-inferiority, and CABG was significantly better than PCI (p=0·0066). As-treated estimates were 28% versus 19% (1·55, 1·18-2·04, p=0·0015). Comparing PCI with CABG, 5 year estimates were 12% versus 9% (1·07, 0·67-1·72, p=0·77) for all-cause mortality, 7% versus 2% (2·88, 1·40-5·90, p=0·0040) for non-procedural myocardial infarction, 16% versus 10% (1·50, 1·04-2·17, p=0·032) for any revascularisation, and 5% versus 2% (2·25, 0·93-5·48, p=0·073) for stroke.

INTERPRETATION - The findings of this study suggest that CABG might be better than PCI for treatment of left main stem coronary artery disease.

FUNDING - Biosensors, Aarhus University Hospital, and participating sites.

Abstract

Recommended Article

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

ABSTRACT