CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week Long-Term Incremental Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction A Study of the Collaborative Registry on CMR in STEMI Quality of Care in Chinese Hospitals: Processes and Outcomes After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Interventional Cardiology: From Decision-Making Aid to Advanced Interventional Procedure Assistance Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Electrocardiography US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Genotype-Guided Strategy for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction Galectin-3 Levels and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Study

Review Article2018 Oct 16;72(16):1972-1980.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Rab T, Ratanapo S, Kern KB et al. Keywords: cardiogenic shock; care pathway; shock center

ABSTRACT

Despite advances over the past decade, the incidence of cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction has increased, with an unchanged mortality near 50%. Recent trials have not clarified the best strategies in treatment. While dedicated cardiac shock centers are being established, there are no standardized agreements on the utilization of mechanical circulatory support and the timeliness of percutaneous coronary intervention strategies. In some centers and prospective registries, outcomes after placement of advanced mechanical circulatory support prior to reperfusion therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention have been encouraging with improved survival. Here, we suggest systems of care with a treatment pathway for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.