CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Relationship between therapeutic effects on infarct size in acute myocardial infarction and therapeutic effects on 1-year outcomes: A patient-level analysis of randomized clinical trials Elective Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Incidence, Determinants, and Outcome (From the CORONOR Study) In vivo comparison of lipid-rich plaque on near-infrared spectroscopy with histopathological analysis of coronary atherectomy specimens Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Interventional Cardiology: From Decision-Making Aid to Advanced Interventional Procedure Assistance Shock Team Approach in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Proof of Concept Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk The year in cardiovascular medicine 2020: interventional cardiology Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes
|<<... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ...>>|

Original Research2017 Jun;188:18-25.

JOURNAL：Am Heart J. Article Link

Relationship between therapeutic effects on infarct size in acute myocardial infarction and therapeutic effects on 1-year outcomes: A patient-level analysis of randomized clinical trials

Selker HP, Udelson JE, Ruthazer R et al. Keywords: infarct size; therapeutic effects; acute myocardial infarction

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - While infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been generally associated with long-term prognosis, whether a therapeutic effect on infarct size has a corresponding therapeutic effect on long-term outcomes is unknown.


METHODS - Using combined patient-level data from 10 randomized trials of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI, we created multivariable Cox proportional hazard models for one-year heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality, which included clinical features and a variable representing treatment effect on infarct size. The trials included 2679 participants; infarct size was measured at a median 4 days post infarction.


RESULTS - Mean infarct size among the control groups ranged from 16% to 35% of the left ventricle, and from 12% to 36% among treatment groups. There was a significant relationship between treatment effect on infarct size and treatment effect on 1-year heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.93, P=.0006), but not on one-year mortality (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06). The treatment effect between infarct size and heart failure hospitalization was stable in sensitivity analyses adjusting for time from STEMI onset to infarct size assessment, and when considering heart failure as the main outcome and death as a competing risk.


CONCLUSIONS - We conclude that early treatment-induced effects on infarct size are related in direction and magnitude to treatment effects on heart failure hospitalizations. This finding enables consideration of using infarct size as a valid surrogate outcome measure in assessing new STEMI treatments.


Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top