CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Guidelines in review: Comparison of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation Qualitative Methodology in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Contemporary Look Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Systemic microvascular dysfunction in microvascular and vasospastic angina Phenomapping for Novel Classification of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Better Prognosis After Complete Revascularization Using Contemporary Coronary Stents in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Angiography Alone Versus Angiography Plus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes From the Pan-London PCI Cohort The Prognostic Value of Exercise Echocardiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Original Research2018 Jun;25(3):769-776.

JOURNAL:J Nucl Cardiol. Article Link

Guidelines in review: Comparison of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

Prejean SP, Din M, Reyes E et al. Keywords: Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; coronary artery disease; non-invasive imaging; stress testing

ABSTRACT


In this Guidelines in Review, we review side-by-side the recommendations provided by the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. We review the recommendations for imaging in the evaluation of patients with possible ACS followed by the diagnostic evaluation of patients with proven NSTE-ACS, based on their risk for adverse clinical events.