CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

左主干支架

科研文章

荐读文献

Left Main Stenting: What We Have Learnt So Far? Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease The Current State of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial 2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy Impact of different final optimization techniques on long-term clinical outcomes of left main cross-over stenting Novel developments in revascularization for left main coronary artery disease Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting According to Lesion Site Results From the EXCEL Trial Bypass Surgery or Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes

Editorial2019;321(24):2409-2411.

JOURNAL:JAMA. Article Link

Dual Antiplatelet TherapyIs It Time to Cut the Cord With Aspirin?

KM Ziada; DJ Moliterno et al. Keywords: DAPT; 1-month clopidogrel vs. 12 month aspirin and clopidogrel; clinical outcomes; 3 years

ABSTRACT


Since evidence of increased risk of stent thrombosis with first-generation drug-eluting stents surfaced in 20051,2 and the US Food and Drug Administration advised interventional cardiologists to use dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following implantation of drug-eluting stents, the appropriate duration of DAPT has been widely studied and hotly debated. Dual antiplatelet therapy consists of concurrent administration of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. Determining the duration of DAPT requires a balance between 2 objectives: lowering the risk of ischemic events with more intense and longer antiplatelet therapy vs lowering the risk of bleeding events with less intense and shorter antiplatelet therapy. Because second-generation drug-eluting stents are associated with lower rates of stent thrombosis,3 the argument against longer DAPT was revisited. The updated guidelines incorporated such considerations by recommending a shorter duration of DAPT for selected patients, namely those with stable clinical status in whom risk of ischemic events is low.4,5