CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

左主干支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Left-main restenosis in the DES era-a call for action Current Interventions for the Left Main Bifurcation One or two stents for the distal Left Main bifurcation The DK crush V study - The DK crush V study Left Main Revascularization in 2017 Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single-center study Design and rationale for the treatment effects of provisional side branch stenting and DK crush stenting techniques in patients with unprotected distal left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions (DKCRUSH V) Trial Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial

Original ResearchVolume 11, Issue 10, October 2018

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Article Link

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Abnormal V/Q Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

K Chan, S Ioannidis, JG Coghlan et al. Keywords: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; pulmonary angiogrampulmonary arterial hypertension; pulmonary hypertension;

ABSTRACT

 

OBJECTIVES - This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of abnormal ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) without thromboembolism, especially in patients with group I pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

 

BACKGROUND - American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend V/Q scan for screening for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The significance of patients with abnormal V/Q SPECT findings but no thromboembolism demonstrated in further investigations remained unclear. A distinct pattern of global patchy changes not typical of thromboembolism is recognized, but guidelines for reporting these in the context of PAH are lacking.

 

METHODS - A total of 136 patients who underwent V/Q SPECT and right-sided heart catheterization showing mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mm Hg were included. V/Q SPECT findings were reported using European Association of Nuclear Medicine criteria for pulmonary embolism followed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography screening for positive thromboembolism and further invasive pulmonary angiography for distal thromboembolism. The abnormal V/Q SPECT images were further analyzed according to perfusion pattern into focal or global perfusion defects.

 

RESULTS - V/Q SPECT showed thromboembolic disease in 44 patients, but 19 of these patients had no thromboembolism demonstrated by pulmonary angiography. Among these patients, 15 of 19 (78.9%) had group I PAH, and the majority had diffuse, patchy perfusion defects. After redefining V/Q SPECT images according to the perfusion pattern, those patients with global perfusion defects had higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure compared with patients with focal perfusion defects and normal scans (mean difference +13.9 and +6.2 mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.0002), as well as higher pulmonary vascular resistance (mean difference +316.6 and +226.3 absolute resistance units, respectively; p = 0.004). Among patients with PAH, global perfusion defects were associated with higher all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio of 5.63 (95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 28.5) compared with patients with focal or no perfusion abnormalities.

 

CONCLUSIONS -  There is a high incidence of abnormal V/Q SPECT scans in nonthromboembolic PAH. Further studies are needed to investigate the poor outcome associated with abnormal V/Q SPECT findings in the context of PAH.