CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

左主干支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study Novel developments in revascularization for left main coronary artery disease Bypass Surgery or Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes Left Main Revascularization With PCI or CABG in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: EXCEL Trial Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting According to Lesion Site Results From the EXCEL Trial Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial Design and rationale for a randomised comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients with left main coronary artery disease: the EXCEL trial Intravascular Ultrasound to Guide Left Main Stem Intervention: A Sub-Study of the NOBLE Trial

Original ResearchVolume 11, Issue 10, October 2018

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Article Link

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Abnormal V/Q Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

K Chan, S Ioannidis, JG Coghlan et al. Keywords: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; pulmonary angiogrampulmonary arterial hypertension; pulmonary hypertension;

ABSTRACT

 

OBJECTIVES - This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of abnormal ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) without thromboembolism, especially in patients with group I pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

 

BACKGROUND - American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend V/Q scan for screening for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The significance of patients with abnormal V/Q SPECT findings but no thromboembolism demonstrated in further investigations remained unclear. A distinct pattern of global patchy changes not typical of thromboembolism is recognized, but guidelines for reporting these in the context of PAH are lacking.

 

METHODS - A total of 136 patients who underwent V/Q SPECT and right-sided heart catheterization showing mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mm Hg were included. V/Q SPECT findings were reported using European Association of Nuclear Medicine criteria for pulmonary embolism followed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography screening for positive thromboembolism and further invasive pulmonary angiography for distal thromboembolism. The abnormal V/Q SPECT images were further analyzed according to perfusion pattern into focal or global perfusion defects.

 

RESULTS - V/Q SPECT showed thromboembolic disease in 44 patients, but 19 of these patients had no thromboembolism demonstrated by pulmonary angiography. Among these patients, 15 of 19 (78.9%) had group I PAH, and the majority had diffuse, patchy perfusion defects. After redefining V/Q SPECT images according to the perfusion pattern, those patients with global perfusion defects had higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure compared with patients with focal perfusion defects and normal scans (mean difference +13.9 and +6.2 mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.0002), as well as higher pulmonary vascular resistance (mean difference +316.6 and +226.3 absolute resistance units, respectively; p = 0.004). Among patients with PAH, global perfusion defects were associated with higher all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio of 5.63 (95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 28.5) compared with patients with focal or no perfusion abnormalities.

 

CONCLUSIONS -  There is a high incidence of abnormal V/Q SPECT scans in nonthromboembolic PAH. Further studies are needed to investigate the poor outcome associated with abnormal V/Q SPECT findings in the context of PAH.