CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Congestive Heart Failure

Abstract

Recommended Article

Cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with acute decompensated heart failure randomized to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril in the PIONEER-HF trial Haemodynamic-guided management of heart failure (GUIDE-HF): a randomised controlled trial Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Modifiable lifestyle factors and heart failure: A Mendelian randomization study 2019 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Risk Assessment, Management, and Clinical Trajectory of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee Guideline‐Directed Medical Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Midrange Ejection Fraction: A Patient‐Pooled Analysis From the KorHF and KorAHF Registries The Role of the Pericardium in Heart Failure: Implications for Pathophysiology and Treatment

Clinical Trial2020 May 14. [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Safety and efficacy of the bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in high-risk patients undergoing PCI: TWILIGHT-SYNERGY

U Baber, R Chandiramani, R Mehran et al. Keywords: stent comparation; DES; bioabsorbable; durable polymer; high-risk patients

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Data examining the safety and efficacy of the bioabsorbable polymer (BP) drugeluting stent (DES) as compared with durable polymer (DP) DES in highrisk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain limited.

 

METHODS - We conducted a prespecified analysis among patients enrolled in the TWILIGHT trial treated with the SYNERGY BPDES or a DPDES. Following successful PCI and 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were randomized to aspirin or placebo for 1 year; DES choice was at physician discretion. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) [composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST)].

 

RESULTS - Among enrolled participants (N = 9006), 653 were treated exclusively with the SYNERGY BPDES and 6404 with a comparator DPDES. Over 15 months, TLF rates were 6.4% and 6.1% among those receiving a SYNERGY BPDES and a DPDES, respectively (adjusted HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.64 1.35; p = 0.72). The effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and the composite of allcause death, MI or stroke was uniform across DES groups (both pint >0.10).

 

CONCLUSIONS - The safety and efficacy profile of the SYNERGY BPDES is comparable to that of contemporary DPDES in highrisk patients undergoing PCI. Compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin, the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy is consistent among patients receiving SYNERGY BPDES or DPDES.

 

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.