CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Congestive Heart Failure

Abstract

Recommended Article

Heart Failure With Mid-Range (Borderline) Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Future Directions Outcomes and Effect of Treatment According to Etiology in HFrEF An Analysis of PARADIGM-HF Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure Diagnosis of Nonischemic Stage B Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Parameters for Prediction of Heart Failure Change in plasma volume and prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure: an observational cohort study Diuretic Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Differential Impact of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction on Men and Women

Clinical Trial2020 May 14. [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Safety and efficacy of the bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in high-risk patients undergoing PCI: TWILIGHT-SYNERGY

U Baber, R Chandiramani, R Mehran et al. Keywords: stent comparation; DES; bioabsorbable; durable polymer; high-risk patients

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Data examining the safety and efficacy of the bioabsorbable polymer (BP) drugeluting stent (DES) as compared with durable polymer (DP) DES in highrisk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain limited.

 

METHODS - We conducted a prespecified analysis among patients enrolled in the TWILIGHT trial treated with the SYNERGY BPDES or a DPDES. Following successful PCI and 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were randomized to aspirin or placebo for 1 year; DES choice was at physician discretion. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) [composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST)].

 

RESULTS - Among enrolled participants (N = 9006), 653 were treated exclusively with the SYNERGY BPDES and 6404 with a comparator DPDES. Over 15 months, TLF rates were 6.4% and 6.1% among those receiving a SYNERGY BPDES and a DPDES, respectively (adjusted HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.64 1.35; p = 0.72). The effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and the composite of allcause death, MI or stroke was uniform across DES groups (both pint >0.10).

 

CONCLUSIONS - The safety and efficacy profile of the SYNERGY BPDES is comparable to that of contemporary DPDES in highrisk patients undergoing PCI. Compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin, the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy is consistent among patients receiving SYNERGY BPDES or DPDES.

 

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.